The Arleigh Burke Flight III Destroyer Is What The U.S. Navy Needs

Arleigh Burke Flight III, explained – “This ship is built to fight. You had better know how.”  That quote comes from U.S. Navy Admiral Arleigh Burke, Chief of Naval Operations from 1955-1961, and long prior to that posting, one of the baddest dudes ever to don a naval officer’s uniform during WWII.  His nautical namesake, the Arleigh Burke-class of destroyers, particularly the new Flight III version, is definitely worthy of the old sea dog’s name.

Arleigh Burke Flight III – “Flight” of a Surface Ship?

As strange as the terminology may sound when describing a surface warship, especially to enthusiasts of naval aviation (channeling the Top Gun: Maverick movie here), the Arleigh Burke class “tin cans” are categorized in four separate variants or “Flights.” DDGs 51-71 represent the original design and are designated as Flight I; DDGs 72-78 are Flight II ships; and DDGs 79-124 and DDG 127 are Flight IIA ships. The Flight III baseline will begin with DDGs 125-126 and continue with DDG-128 and follow. The Burke-class, beginning with DDG-51 and the commissioning date of 4 July 1991, replaced the Charles F. Adams class (DDG-2) which had been in service since 1957.

The Burkes were designed with an all-new, all-steel hull form, incorporating much of the Spruance class (DD-963) destroyer propulsion and machinery plant, and the integrated Aegis ധҽąքօղs System (AWS) proven on the Kidd class (DD 993) destroyers and installed on the larger Ticonderoga class cruisers. AWS is composed of a multi-function phased array radar, advanced AAW and ASW systems, VLS, and the Tomahawk ധҽąքօղ System.  For good old-fashioned ship-to-ship engagements and shore bombardment duties, these destroyers also retain the 5-inch Mk45 Gun.

Regardless of the specific Flight variant, the Burke-class is considered a multi-mission guided-missile destroyer designed to operate offensively and defensively, independently, or as units of Carrier Strike Groups, Expeditionary Strike Groups, and Surface Action Groups in multi-threat environments that include air, surface and subsurface threats. These ultramodern warships will respond to Low Intensity Conflict/Coastal and Littoral Offshore ധąɾƒąɾҽ scenarios, as well as open ocean conflict, providing or augmenting power projection, forward presence requirements and escort operations at sea.

What separates the Flight III variant from the rest of the pack is that this upgrade is centered on the AN/SPY-6(V)1 Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) system that provides vastly increased capability over DDG 51 Flight IIA ships. The AMDR enables Flight III ships to simultaneously perform Anti-Air ധąɾƒąɾҽ (AAW) and Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD), which satisfies the Navy’s critical need for an enhanced surface combatant Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) capability.  Given the shockwaves sent through naval communities around the globe by the Ukrainians’ successful sinking of the Russian Black Sea Fleet flagship Moskva, the improvements to BMD capabilities certainly couldn’t have come at a better time for the U.S. Navy!

Arleigh Burke Flight III is Officially Launched

The first of the Flight III warships, the USS Jack H. Lucas (DDG-125), was successfully launched at Huntington Ingalls Industries, Ingalls Shipbuilding division, in Pascagoula, Mississippi, on 4 June 2021.  As DDG-51 Arleigh Burke-class Program Manager, Capt. Seth Miller, remarked, “Flight III ships will provide cutting edge Integrated Air and Missile Defense capability to include significantly greater detection range and tracking capacity. Launching the first Flight III ship, the future Jack H. Lucas, is another important step to delivering Flight III to the Navy.”

Meanwhile, there are two other DDG-51 Flight III class ships currently under construction, namely the future Ted Stevens (DDG-128) and Jeremiah Denton (DDG-129) as Flight III ships. There are a total of 20 DDG 51 class ships under contract at both new construction shipyards, all of which promise to enable the U.S. Navy arsenal to pack an ever more fearsome punch.


Related Posts

TAS Unveils Royal Australian Navy SeaWolf Autonomous Underwater Vessel

Trusted Autonomous Systems are excited that the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) have now publicly acknowledged at IndoPac 22, existing SeaWolf project with Cellula Robotics as one of three…

UK Defence Equipment & Support Secure Type 45 Ballistic Missile Defence Upgrade

The Unites Kingdom is set to become the first European nation to operate a Maritime Ballistic Missile Defence capability that can detect and destroy Anti-Ship Ballistic Missiles as…

Ukraine develops local-made rocket launchers while waiting US & UK artillery systems

According to videos published on social networks, Ukrainian soldiers have developed local-made artillery systems using rocket launchers from BM-21 122mm MLRS or S-8 rocket launchers from Kamov Ka-52…

Australia Orders Naval Strike Missile (NSM) from Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace

Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace (KONGSBERG) has signed an initial contract valued at MNOK 489 with the Commonwealth of Australia for Naval Strike Missile (NSM) capability. The order income…

Harland & Wolff Awarded Contract to Restore Royal Navy Mine-hunting Vessel for Lithuania

British shipyard, Harland & Wolff, has been awarded a £55 million contract to regenerate a former Royal Navy mine-hunting vessel, HMS QUORN. Supporting ambitions to bolster British shipbuilding,…

Russian army receives new batch of T-90M tanks & BREM-1M recovery tanks despite economic sanctions

Despite the economic sanctions against Russia following the invasion of Ukraine, the production of military equipment continues and the Uralvagonzavod company, the producer of tanks for the Russian…

Leave a Reply