This Swedish-Designed Fighter Proved That China’s Air Force Is Far From Invincible

A 2015 wᴀʀ game in Thailand underscored the enduring flaws in Chinese aerial-wᴀʀfare tactics. Despite flying a modern fighter type, Chinese fighter pilots in Thailand were vulnerable to long-range attacks and slow to react to aggressive tactics.

Exercise Falcon Strike 2015, which ran at Korat Royal Thai Air Force Base for two weeks in mid-November 2015, was the first-ever joint exercise between the Chinese and Thai air forces.

The Chinese brought J-11 fighters to the wᴀʀ game. The Thai air force operates F-16s from Korat, but the for the wᴀʀ game the Thai air arm sent Gripen fighters from Surat Thani Air Force Base.


For seven days straight the J-11s tangled with the Gripens. The J-11, which is a Chinese variant of the Russian Su-27, proved to be the superior dogfighter, a Chinese participant in the exercise explained in a presentation at China’s Northwestern Polytechnical University on Dec. 9, 2019. But in Thai hands the Gripen was a better long-range sнooтᴇʀ.


During the first day of mock combat, the J-11s and Gripens fought visual-range battles. The result was a lopsided victory for the Chinese air force. The powerful, twin-engine J-11s with their internal cannons and infrared-guided short-range missiles — possibly PL-8s — “sнoт down” 16 Gripens for zero losses.

In Thai service, the single-engine Gripen for close-range combat is armed with AIM-9 infrared-guided missiles and an internal cannon. It’s worth noting that the Gripen has a relatively poor thrust-to-weight ratio compared to many other fighter types. That limits its maneuverability in ᴅoԍғιԍнтs.

Falcon Strike 2015 Details Unveiled:

The Chinese pilots scored nine κιʟʟs for one loss on day two. But as the wᴀʀ game continued, the Chinese pilots struggled to repeat their early successes.

The exercise shifted to beyond-visual-range engagements, where the Gripen armed with AIM-120 medium-range missiles proved to be the better fighter than the J-11 with its own medium-range missiles, possibly PL-12s.

On day three, the Thai pilots “sнoт down” 19 J-11s for a loss of three Gripens. Over the final three days of the wᴀʀ game, the Thais κιʟʟᴇᴅ 22 Chinese jets and lost three of their own. The final tally for the exercise favored the Thai air force. The Gripens sнoт down 42 J-11s while the J-11s sнoт down just 34 Gripens.

Overall, 88 percent of the Thais’ κιʟʟs occurred at a range of at least 19 miles, while the Chinese scored just 14 percent of their κιʟʟs at the same range. The Gripens scored 10 κιʟʟs at a distance of more than 31 miles. The J-11s scored no κιʟʟs at this range.

“The Chinese pilots had poor situational awareness,” Alert 5 reported, citing the presentation. “Too much focus was on front of the aircraft rather than all around.” In phases of the wᴀʀ game where J-11s escorted other planes, there was a “lack of coordination.”

Chinese pilots “were not experienced in avoiding missile sнoтs,” Alert 5 continued. “Their responses were too mechanical and [they] could not judge correctly the evasive techniques for missiles with different ranges.”

Beijing knows its pilots need better training. Around 2005 the Chinese air force began organizing realistic aerial wᴀʀ games in the vein of the U.S. Air Force’s Red Flag exercises. But these training events have yet to produce skilled pilots who are capable of fully exploiting the best Chinese-made wᴀʀᴘʟᴀɴᴇs.

“Numerous professional articles and speeches by high-ranking Chinese officers indicate the [Chinese air force] does not believe that its past training practices prepared its pilots and other per­sonnel for actual combat,” the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency explained in its January 2019 report on the Chinese military. “Unrealistic training manifested itself in multiple ways that hin­dered the [Chinese air arm]’s air-combat capabilities.”

The Chinese military “recognizes that a gap exists between the skills of its pilots and those in the air forces of powerful nations,” the DIA continued in its report. “To address training weak­nesses, [a former air force] commander said that when the [air force] trains, it must ‘train for battle’ instead of ‘doing things for show…[or] going through the motions.’”


Related Posts

TAS Unveils Royal Australian Navy SeaWolf Autonomous Underwater Vessel

Trusted Autonomous Systems are excited that the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) have now publicly acknowledged at IndoPac 22, existing SeaWolf project with Cellula Robotics as one of three…

UK Defence Equipment & Support Secure Type 45 Ballistic Missile Defence Upgrade

The Unites Kingdom is set to become the first European nation to operate a Maritime Ballistic Missile Defence capability that can detect and destroy Anti-Ship Ballistic Missiles as…

Ukraine develops local-made rocket launchers while waiting US & UK artillery systems

According to videos published on social networks, Ukrainian soldiers have developed local-made artillery systems using rocket launchers from BM-21 122mm MLRS or S-8 rocket launchers from Kamov Ka-52…

Australia Orders Naval Strike Missile (NSM) from Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace

Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace (KONGSBERG) has signed an initial contract valued at MNOK 489 with the Commonwealth of Australia for Naval Strike Missile (NSM) capability. The order income…

Harland & Wolff Awarded Contract to Restore Royal Navy Mine-hunting Vessel for Lithuania

British shipyard, Harland & Wolff, has been awarded a £55 million contract to regenerate a former Royal Navy mine-hunting vessel, HMS QUORN. Supporting ambitions to bolster British shipbuilding,…

Russian army receives new batch of T-90M tanks & BREM-1M recovery tanks despite economic sanctions

Despite the economic sanctions against Russia following the invasion of Ukraine, the production of military equipment continues and the Uralvagonzavod company, the producer of tanks for the Russian…

Leave a Reply